Is Amy Winehouse gunna have to choke a b*tch?
My boys over at Fox News (Fair And Balanced…They Report…You Decide) are currently reporting that two of my closest shorties are fighting and stuff.
“I don’t think she deserved (her Grammys). I think she needs to get her life together first, and then get the awards later," said NATALIE COLE, a singer who perhaps best known for winning a Grammy by singing a duet with a computer, after FINALLY getting off her OWN lengthy drug problem.
Cole went on to call Winehouse "crazy" (which Dave Chappelle warns us NEVER to do) and says that Amy’s influence is going to teach youngsters that they can benefit and be rewarded by bad behavior.
Honestly, after watching all Amy has gone throughthis last year (which yes, WAS self-inflicted, but
still quite sad), I am glad to see her come away with some deserving awards. Cole is also the last person who should be criticizing someone else for their substance-abuse issues due to her afformentioned history. BTW, she also won a Grammy during that period of her life. And no, she didn’t give it back.
What probably stood out most to me however was that Cole was blatenly saying that The Grammy’s should NOT be awarded due to the actual music but moreso the person and their standing in society. Sorry Natalie, not all of us could have been so lucky to have been born into a family that you once called "the black Kennedys".
I hope they brawl! Who do you think would win?
